CO129-508-5 Supreme Court of Hong Kong- slackness of registry accounting methods 28-10-1927 - 23-4-1928 — Page 136

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

136

Mr. Melbourne.

Mr. Hill and the Registrar. I know they saw Mr. Hill and I heard them complaining to him. Many others sent letters complaining addressed some to the Regis- trar and some to the Head Balliff. I knew because

Mr. Hill saw the letters and showed them to me when

he wanted to see the file. I have a few letters in my drawer now (These prove to be subsequent to 21.8.26 except one from Lee & Russ dated 13.8.26).

It is not my duty. I told them to see

Q:48

A:48

Q:49

A:49

Q:50

A:50

Q:51

A:51

Q:52

A:52

1

Had you any interest in the Autioneering & Brokering Co.,Ltd. as shareholder or otherwise?

No. I had no interest in it and was not a

share-holder.

So Ho Yue is your alias?

Yes.

Do you know Wong Fung Sek?

Yes.

Did you receive any security when you

asvanced $3,000?

I got a receipt as security. This was given me by Mr. Hill. He signed it and said I should get the money back in 10 days. He told me that if the "Ling Nam" was sold the money must pass through the Court and he could pay it back to me. This money belonged to

salt fish dealers merchants my friend

Shop Chan Sau Fong.

-

-

-

Wei Lun

You were asked to turn up files in relation to distraints Nos.404,523,533,564,598 & 630 are they here?

404,523 & 533 cannot be found. The others are

hare.

Q:53 What was done in these cases?

A:53 The money was not paid to me. The plaintiff came

here with the auctioneer. The plaintiff paid only the

commission to the Autioneer as he had bought in.

A4

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.